Workshop: Opportunity audit
Produce artifact #1: the scored opportunity inventory — 15–25 candidates, each with capability, value lever, data readiness, and an owner who actually nodded.
First workshop, first artifact. The opportunity inventory is the raw material for every later decision: a single table of every credible candidate, scored consistently, owned specifically. Run it for your real organization if you can (strongly preferred) or for Alder using the case details — the worked example below shows the standard.
- 1Run the three passes (chain walk, money leaks, floor harvest) for your scope. Target 15–25 candidates: fewer means the passes were shallow; many more means you're listing tasks, not opportunities. Use the capability-matching prompt to pressure-test each.
- 2Fill the seven columns per candidate (see Alder's excerpt): the one-line opportunity, the capability verb, the value lever (cost / revenue / risk / speed / quality) with the line item it touches, the volume (runs per month), data readiness (green: exists and accessible / yellow: exists, messy / red: doesn't exist), error tolerance (draft-reviewed / triaged / must-be-right), and a named owner — a person, not a department.
- 3Do the owner check for real. Fifteen minutes with each named owner: 'would this help, would your team use it, what did I get wrong?' Candidates whose owners shrug get marked — a shrug now is a stalled pilot later. (Expect two surprises: an owner who kills a favorite, and an owner who upgrades one you almost cut.)
- 4Red-flag but keep the ineligible. Candidates that fail data readiness or error tolerance stay in the inventory, flagged, with what would unblock them ('needs 12 months of appointment data'; 'needs the quality gate from a data-foundations effort'). Today's red flags are next year's pipeline — and the flags themselves are input to your data-investment case.
- 5Skim for themes before Module 2. Alder's inventory clustered around documents-in-motion (extract/classify everywhere) and promises-to-customers (predict ETA, predict profitability). Clusters hint at platform choices — one document-AI capability serving six candidates beats six point solutions, a thought Module 3 will finish.
OPPORTUNITY CAP. LEVER (line item) VOL/MO DATA ERR-TOL OWNER
exception-email triage classify cost+speed (svc credits) 3,000 grn triaged R.Diaz, CS
quote-tender extraction extract speed+rev (win rate) 400 grn draft-rev M.Chen, Sales
predictive ETA, top-20 predict rev-retention (churn) 9,000 yel triaged J.Okafor, Ops
contract-risk summarizer generate risk (legal spend) 25 grn draft-rev L.Park, Legal
...
flagged red: dock-detention predictor (appointment data doesn't
exist yet) - unblock: capture appointment times in the TMS
(transportation management system) starting Q3This lesson reads in ~16 minutes; the workshop does not fit in 16 minutes. The three passes plus the owner interviews are ~5+ hours of work spread across 2–3 weeks of elapsed calendar time (owners are busy). DELEGABLE to a chief of staff or analyst: the chain-walk drafting, the money-leak data pull, scheduling and note-taking on owner interviews. YOU, PERSONALLY: the owner conversations that matter politically, and the final call on which shrugs kill a candidate.
You get a rival inventory for Alder drafted by an enthusiastic consultant: 22 rows, every one scored green, three capabilities misassigned, two owners who were never asked, and one candidate that's secretly a data project. Find the seven problems. Auditing someone else's optimism is the exact skill your steering committee will need from you.